Chief Justice Martha Koome has raised alarm over the recent withdrawal of her security detail, calling it a direct threat to the independence of the Judiciary. In a strongly worded statement, Justice Koome expressed deep concerns about the implications of the decision, highlighting its potential to undermine the Judiciary’s critical role in upholding democracy and the rule of law.
“The withdrawal of my security is a concerning act that not only exposes me to potential risks but also threatens the autonomy of the Judiciary, which is a cornerstone of our constitutional democracy,” Justice Koome said.
This development comes amidst growing concerns over the safety and independence of judicial officers in Kenya. Over the years, the Judiciary has faced challenges in maintaining its operational independence, often finding itself at the center of political and institutional tussles.
The National Police Service (NPS), however, sought to downplay the controversy. Police spokesperson Dr. Resila Onyango clarified that the officers attached to the Chief Justice were not permanently withdrawn but had been recalled for mandatory promotional courses.
“The officers were recalled to attend promotional courses as part of their professional development. This is a routine process and does not in any way compromise the safety of the Chief Justice or the Judiciary,” Dr. Onyango explained, assuring the public that Justice Koome’s security remains a priority.
Despite the clarification, the move has sparked public debate and drawn criticism from legal experts, civil society groups, and political commentators. Many argue that the timing of the security withdrawal raises questions about the commitment to protecting the independence of the Judiciary.
“This is not just about the security of the Chief Justice; it is about safeguarding the integrity and independence of an institution that is fundamental to our democracy,” said a spokesperson from the Law Society of Kenya.
The incident has reignited discussions about the need for robust mechanisms to ensure the Judiciary can operate without undue interference or threats. As public pressure mounts, stakeholders are urging the government to resolve the matter swiftly and amicably to avoid eroding public confidence in the Judiciary.
For now, the spotlight remains on the government and the National Police Service to ensure the safety of judicial officers while reaffirming their commitment to upholding the rule of law and the separation of powers.
